15.6.09

I know this isn't local, but I thought you al needed to read this

Iran protest cancelled as leaked election results show Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came third

Iran's reformist presidential candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi has called off a major rally to protest last Friday's election results, amid claims police had been cleared to open fire on protesters.

Supporters had been due to turn out en masse in Tehran on Monday afternoon, despite government warnings to stay off the streets.

But this morning, a statement on Mr Mousavi's campaign website announced that the demonstration had been postponed – although it said Mr Mousavi would go to the site to ensure any supporters who showed up remained calm.

Mr Mousavi's wife and co-campaigner, Zahra Ranavard, was reported as warning that riot squads would be equipped with live ammunition, raising the prospect of serious bloodshed.

Iran's Interior Ministry said Mr Mousavi would be responsible for any consequences if he went ahead with the protest.

Mr Mousavi's cancellation of the protest came as sporadic disturbances continued around the Iranian capital, and reports circulated of leaked interior ministry statistics showing him as the clear victor in last Friday's polls.

The statistics, circulated on Iranian blogs and websites, claimed Mr Mousavi had won 19.1 million votes while Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won only 5.7 million.

The two other candidates, reformist Mehdi Karoubi and hardliner Mohsen Rezai, won 13.4 million and 3.7 million respectively. The authenticity of the leaked figures could not be confirmed.

Mr Mousavi has accused Iran's government of "fraud" after Mr Ahmadinejad was declared on Saturday to have 62.6 per cent of the vote, making him the landslide winner. The capital has been rocked by disturbances for the last three days.

It was not clear whether Mr Mousavi's supporters would heed his call to stay indoors. About 200 relatives of people arrested during protests over the weekend staged a brief protest outside Tehran's main revolutionary court.

"You can beat us as much as you can, but take us to our children," shouted one woman, as a policeman was seen beating a man in a bid to disperse the crowd. Around 170 people are believed to have been detained so far, and are thought to have been taken to Tehran's Evin prison.

In an effort to quell the rising tensions, the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has ordered an investigation into claims of fraud in Friday's disputed vote, according to Iranian state television.

Meanwhile, David Miliband, the British Foreign Secretary, raised concern over the implications of the disputed elections for Iran's engagement with the West and for efforts to curb its controversial nuclear programme.

"Our serious concern is about the implications of recent events for the engagement the international community seeks with the government of Iran," Miliband told reporters as he arrived for a meeting with European Union counterparts in Luxembourg today.

"The implications are not yet clear."

Mr Mousavi had previously threatened to hold a sit-in protest at the mausoleum of the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, if the authorities banned his followers from holding their rally. It is thought the government would be reluctant to forcibly break a demonstration in what is considered a holy place.

A reformist activist close to Mr Mousavi, Shahab Tabatabaei, said his supporters were determined to hold rally despite the interior ministry's rejection.

Overnight, squads of police and their allies in Iran's basiji gangs, a plain clothes militia made up of civilian hardliners, stormed the campus at the city's biggest university, ransacking dormitories and arresting dozens of students.

29.4.09

Spector may not be automatic Vote.. but he's a realist

“I will not be an automatic 60th vote,” Specter said Tuesday afternoon. “I would illustrate that with my position on employee choice, also known as card check. I think it’s a bad deal and I’m opposed to it. I will not vote to impose cloture. … If the Democratic Party asks too much, I will not vote with them.” -Politico

What does this mean for this like the EFCA vote? Well according to Employee Free Choice Report, even though he said in his statement he would not change his vote on EFCA, it might.

"My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords' switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change."

Spector was the only Republican to vote for cloture last year on HR 800 EFCA. I am hopeful that a small change in the bill might help him change his mind. Further, Spector now realizes that he will need Democratic Party support in the next election. Without their support with one of the central issues being EFCA, he can't expect be elected for a 5th term. I Believe with enough pressure, he can become the needed vote for labor.

Spector Makes 59..Franken makes 60



The news is in. Yes! Arlen Spector a life long Republican from Pennsylvania decided recently to switch party's making the race..assuming Franken is seating (which is all but inevitable) up to 60 votes. This is so important because it would provide a veto proof majority in Congress that wuold allow the President to sign crucial legislation loike Health care, energy, education and hopefully Labor reform

Spector was seen as a vulnerable candidate in 2010, where he was loosing in his Republican primary. This is a symptom of a larger issue of Republicans driving moderates out of the party. In his statement He cited that the party was taking ideology over political relevance. "They don't make any bones about their willingness to lose the general election if they can purify the party. I don't understand it but that's what they say."

60 votes... 60 that's huge. It has always been the magic number. With Franken getting seated in the future, real reform will happen in this Congress. The last few months have been filled with Republicans using their Senate minority to block legislation and to make the Democrats look bad, but with this vote, that could change. Granted Spector isn't an automatic vote, butmif he wants to do well in the Democratic primary in 13 Months, he will have to take Democratic Party Platform possitions.


What Does this mean For Franken?

This means the stakes just hot higher. A 60th vote in the senate would make the minority party less relevent. This makes the Coleman lawsuit even more applicable and John Cornyn's push for the Supreme Court appeal even louder.

But.. Pawlenty said that Spector's decision didnt affect the contest in Minnesota, or when he would sign a certificate. This could be good or bad news for Democrats because Pawlenty remains vague on the issue.
"We're going to follow the law with respect to the Franken/Coleman litigation and when and how a certificate gets issued," Pawlenty said. "So again, the situation with Pennsylvania has no connection or impact on what's going to happen in Minnesota."



This could be a historic moment. We will just have to wait and see.

16.4.09

Bachmann....crazier than ever

Bachmann has had some really juicy stuff that she has said lately. false one's about Keith and Obama among others. Take a look at my blog roll. Read the link DUMP MICHELE BACHMANN
--------->



That Being said. Her fear mongering has done her well in the camp0aign office. She raised more than 300,000 dollars in the first quarter of the year. This is on top of another quarter million in the bank reports the MN INDY

Reich 4 One

Hey all of you Northeasters. I apologize for not posting immediately after the endorsing convention but I have been busy. regardless, Northeast and the first ward had overwhelming support for community organizer and Co Chair of Windom Citizens In Action Kevin Reich. He has secured the DFL endorsement. I encourage you folks to volunteer for his campaign. Kevin is a nice guy and has a solid past in the community. Sure he has the DFL endorsement now, whivh is practically the biggest step to CityHall, He still needs volunteers for the primary, where he will face Susan Howitz-Hanna and possible other candidates. Then a general election.

The Importance of volunteering for zKevin, is that if you volunteer, you get the ear of the candidate. Being an activist will help you get your issues heard. So go get your voice heard.

Go here:

http://www.reich4ward1.com/donatevolunteer.html


Even in an election that looks pretty solid, it is important to get involved because there are always important issues like the debt, projects and workers rights that need attention.

Coleman -sore loser - Minnesotan's want him gone

It is sure nice living in this little old state tucked away and near Canada getting noticed on a national scale. But frankly, I don't like that we are noticed for our crazy politics.

Coleman recently told the Pioneer Press that "We Will Never Know who won." claiming that margin is so close that it our elections were not designed.

What Coleman forgot, is that we have a system for this. It is called a recount panel and a challenging trial. Norm Coleman has exhausted his chances of winning outside of appeals. Not only did the the tri-partisan trail judges soundly reject his claims...and pretty much already answer the questions presented to the supreme court, but they made it clear only legal votes were aloud to be introduced.

Minnesotan have now seen that Coleman's time has past to concede. In a recent poll Minnesotas now believe he should concede by about 2:1

Do you think Norm Coleman should appeal the decision and continue to fight in court or should Coleman concede the race?

Appeal: 37%
Concede: 63%

9.4.09

"It's just wrong" - says MIT economist about Bachmann


G.O.P. leaders in the house have perpetually been using a $3128 figure to try and scare people into not supporting the cap and trade system that is being proposed by Obama and the Democratic leadership. Most recently was our own crazy lady Michele Bachmann. She decided in yesterday's Oped that she would perpetuate the wrong numbers used by the GOP that crunch two irrelevant numbers.

Bachmann and her friends use a number ($3128 per household) that nowhere can be found in the M.I.T. report. This number in fact was debunked by the MIT economist John Reilly in an article by the St. Petersburg Times more than two weeks ago.


"It's just wrong," said John Reilly, an energy, environmental and agricultural economist at M.I.T. and one of the authors of the report. "It's wrong in so many ways it's hard to begin."

Not only is it wrong, but he told the House Republicans it was wrong when they asked him.

"Someone from the House Republicans had called me (March 20) and asked about this," Reilly said. "I had explained why the estimate they had was probably incorrect and what they should do to correct it, but I think this wrong number was already floating around by that time."


The report by MIT used a figure 100 times smaller than the Bachmann number. The average increase per household would come out to be $30.89. That is an absolute world of difference. 100 times larger than the MIT figure, really? How many flaming pants can we send to her before she gets the message?

So basically, here we see another stumble with Congresswoman Bachmann, with nearly 20 staff in her office and additional staff in her campaign, you think they could come up with a number that supports what the researcher at MIT used. In fact the article in the SPT is from the 24th of March, in my opinion plenty of time to get your facts straight. Making up and misrepresenting numbers is lying. There is noway around it. Bachmann is doing herself no favors by taking false information from talking points and perpetuating them in the media.

It is pretty evident that Bachmann will continue to advance her slanted agenda, News outlets need to be aware of her figures vs the ones that actually exist. I invite her to use figures that may support her political agenda, but don't use numbers that make a liar out of yourself. Bachmann needs to get her numbers straight,and the Strib needs to fact-check when they publish articles like this.


P.S. - sorry for the blog vac. -I've been swamped with other responsibilities

26.3.09

Employee Free Choice Act - needs your support

The Employee Free Choice Act which was blocked by Republicans and President Bush in the last Congress, was looking like it might pass with a new President, but President Obama doesn't seem to be very pro-labor right now and frankly I am disappointed. The President and the Democrats that support this bill NEED to lobby their colleuges in the Senate to get this bill on the floor for a cloture vote. 58 Votes will not cut it. This bill needs 60.

"Specter announced his opposition a day before a new Quinnipiac poll found him down 14 points to conservative former Rep. Pat Toomey, his likely primary opponent in the 2010 Pennsylvania Senate race. His defection left supporters scrambling to find a new way forward amid admissions that some changes are likely." reports POLITICO

"The most likely Republican supporters — Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and George Voinovich of Ohio — have already declared their opposition to the bill."

There is no better time to pass this legislation than now! With executive pay skyrocketting, workers being fired and laid off for frivaless things, a tough economy with a lot of uncertainty and businesses still engaging in union busting, the bill could really help not just the unionized workers of America but all labor. This legislation poses a threat to the status-quo. It could really help curb the exploitation on the average guy by executives.


Labor has been waiting for this bill for years and years. I think if labor doesn't get their way, There is going to be a fight! Labor may only be 11% of the constituents in this country, but it holds a lot of power in PAC money. I guarantee that if the bill doesn't get passed, or a luke-warm bill gets passed than you will see the most aggressive union movement in decades.

To add to that: This is just another Issue where the Republican Senate Campaign Committee is just trying to hold Franken out of office. He would be a very key vote on EFCA and subtracting a vote from the Dems on this one hurts.

25.3.09

Michele Bachman - don't they send these people to school?




I know someone of you have seen this all over the internet already. It makes me wonder how such a person could just sleep through civics class and then get elected to serve 600,000 constituents. Michele Bachmann is dangerous, not because shes tactical, but because she is so misinformed and controversial. They need her to read the constitution.

Article I, section 8 says, "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

That includes the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, creating the central banking system. It also includes the legislation passed by Congress that gives th Treasury dept. executive power and money.

The Republicans need to vet this lady before she opens her mouth. It just becomes awkward and embarrassing to the entire minority party.

16.3.09

AIG BAILOUT? More Like AIG Bonuses Fund

Outrageous.... Absolutely outrageous. The greed just never ends does it??

11.3.09

Omnibus Hypocricy in the Senate

It is nice to hear that Senators saying things along the line of "no more bridges to nowhere." I agreed to an extent with the Republican leadership that there were to many solo earmarks in the Omnibus spending bill. What I do not agree with is that out of the Omnibus bill is that they have become hypocrites.


MSNBC Reported

"Indeed, of the 35 U.S. senators who opposed the omnibus spending bill last night -- in the form of a "no" on the cloture vote -- 28 of them had solo earmarks in the legislation.

In total, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, these 28 senators had a combined 307 solo earmarks totaling nearly $240 million. The breakdown is below."

I commend the 7 principled legislator without earmarks in the bill, but as you can see (from list below) the leadership had more earmarks than any other naysayer. McConnell the minority leader has a lot of answering to do.

McConnell simply said “this spending spree needs to come to an end.”

'Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called the spending bill a "missed opportunity" and urged President Obama to veto it. "The bill costs far too much for a government that should be watching every dime," he said.'

But what Sen. Mitch McConnell doesn't mention in his comments about spending is that he himself (a member of the Appropriations Cmte.) secured 75 million in earmarks in the bill and 51 million in solo sponsored earmarks.

If you ask me it seems like complete talking point Fraud. Saying one thing, and doing the exact opposite. This is why republican talking points are sometimes effective but often wrong and not founded in reality.

Many point out this bill is bloated but forget to mention, it is bloated with their own pet projects.

Here is the Obama response to the earmark hypocrisy.




Here's the breakdown:

Barrasso (4 earmarks, $2.7 million)
Bayh (4 earmarks, $1.2 million)
Bennett (23 earmarks, $18 million)
Brownback (21 earmaks, $12 million)
Bunning (5 earmarks, $735,000)
Burr (3 earmarks, $1.3 million)
Chambliss (7 earmarks, $4.3 million)
Collins (1 earmark, $380,000)
Corker (1 earmark, $760,000)
Cornyn (5 earmarks, $2.5 million)
Crapo (1 earmark, $100,000)
Enzi (5 earmarks, $1.7 million)
Graham (14 earmarks, $9.5 million)
Grassley (8 earmarks, $350,000)
Gregg (19 earmarks, $10 million)
Hatch (7 earmarks, $700,000)
Hutchison (35 earmarks, $9.9 million)
Inhofe (34 earmarks, $53 million)
Isakson (2 earmarks, $1.4 million)
Kyl (3 earmarks, $5 million)
Lugar (10 earmarks, $3.3 million)
Martinez (8 earmarks, $18.8 million)
McConnell (36 earmarks, $51 million)
Roberts (11 earmarks, $2.2 million)
Sessions (12 earmarks, $4.3 million)
Thune (6 earmarks, $4.3 million)
Vitter (16 earmarks, $4 million)
Voinovich (6 earmarks, $13.5 million)

Should Politicians Twitter?

I read a post in a MNDaily Blog today about politicians and Twitter and it kind of sparked a question in my mind. Should politicians really twitter? Granted it is their first amendment right, but is it ethical, particularly during speeches. Furthermore, I think we expect our politicians to be some of the most articulate and informed individuals and 140 Characters isn't exactly a policy statement.

What do you people think? Leave me a comment, if they should twitter.

9.3.09

Coleman loses another... argument gets weaker



Coleman's chances of winning the election are surely next to nothing. After the three judge panel decided to open as many as 1500 ballots to see if the proper registration was in the wrong envelope. Turns out out of all 1500 hundred ballots..only nearly 90 were actually admissible. Its not sure how many votes Coleman or Franken will net out of this, but one thing that is definitely true is that: 90 < 225. That shows how even at the end of the trial, Coleman is trying to make desperate attempts to get votes. The math just doesn't add up. If Coleman had 226 ballots to show the Judge Panel, he would have already. At this point it just looks like obstruction. If the campaign had any real argument, they wouldn't be caught so many times without comment....like with this latest Star Tribune report

"After the Secretary of State identified the 89 as containing valid registration forms, Franken lawyer Marc Elias said the number was well below the threshold that "might have opened up" the contest. The Coleman campaign did not have an immediate comment."

6.3.09

Michele bachmann - Just can't shut her mouth can she?

The more she speaks, the more [pick your adjective: comical, sad, stupid, party line, alienating] it gets. Shes pulled all stops this time, equating some of the best Presidents including Johnson and FDR to socialism. even further than that she used this "socialism" argument to connect Obama with such radicals as Bill Ayers. So basically what Michelle Bachmann would like you to believe is that Obama isn't trying to act in the best interest of the United States as President, but rather trying to make us a "socialist" society to please lefty radicals.



She said, “But what I think we’re seeing is an implementation of all of the radical ideas that Bill Ayers and Ward Churchill — the radical ideas that we’ve seen on some college campuses, they’re now being implemented in our government, and they’re taking a nefarious route when it looks at the economic recovery.” Reports Mn Independent






I think I have figured out what Bachmann does. She gets her talking points from the House Minority Leadership and takes everything that the talking points might imply and blatantly spews them out. She lets those talking points float around in her head until she can tell us "her opinion," which is more or less connecting the dots that only exist in her head.

3.3.09

Endorsements explained

Mayor - Bob Miller
I am endorsing Bob Miller over incumbent R.T. Rybak because of Bob Miller's strong involvement and support in the Neighborhood Revitalization Project (NRP). Bob Miller has been the President of the NRP since 1992. NRP in my opinion has done a lo for my neighborhood (Audubon Park) and many others across the City. NRP has been on the chop block and looks to be at thing of the past if RT Rybak is reelected.

Ward 1 - Doron Clark
After careful consideration Doron is a young professional very involved in his Windom Park Neighborhood. HE is co-chair of Windom Park Citizens in Action He has a strong volunteer background including through his church and with the Big Brothers. Much like Bob Miller, he is a strong NRP supporter. I think his young energetic leadership can bring some real change to Northeast.

Ward 2 - Cam Gordon
This Green Party Guy is a freshman Council member that has served the University and Seward Area well. He is right on environmental and sustainability issues. Also, I don't see a viable DFL contender.

Park Board District 1 - Michael Rainville
DeLaSalle alum and Labor Endorsed - that's all I need.

2.3.09

Popular Dissent Endorsements

Ward 1 - Doron Clark, Ward 2 - Cam Gordon, Park Board District 1 - Michael Rainville, Mayor - Bob Miller


More detail to follow

MN Daily exposes Charles Carlson


Amendment: After discussing my post and comments with a blogger friend of Mine I have decided to amend a bit of what I said and be more tactful. I believe that Charles went about this all wrong. I in no way want to attack Carlson's claims of Mental Illness because I am not a doctor and I do no know him personally. That being said I do not agree with the way he apologized to his supporters, the claims he used to suspend his campaign. I am glad when he was discovered that he came to his senses before the endorsing process began. My initial reaction was harsh because I have a history w/ disabilities and do not like them used as an excuse.


Corrections made 3/2/09:


I don't really know what to say about this other than...Wow!!! I knew Charles was not a very truthful person according to my good friend Katherine who is an Owatanna native who knew him when she was in high school, but this is kind of ridiculous. Some of this stuff is very concerning. I am very proud of the Minnesota Daily's investigation to expose lies. The last thing we need is more lying politicians. These things are kind of ridiculous.

"
Student to drop from City Council race, lied about past

Subhead:
An investigation by The Minnesota Daily found that Carlson lied on several occasions concerning items such as his college education at Princeton University and where he grew up.

BY Briana Bierschbach
PUBLISHED: 03/02/2009

Just days before DFL caucusing begins for Minneapolis City Council elections, Charles Carlson — University of Minnesota student and Minnesota representative at the Democratic National Convention — said he will announce Monday his withdrawal from the Ward 2 councilmember race following a series of lies regarding his past and his qualifications.

An investigation by The Minnesota Daily found that Carlson lied on several occasions concerning items such as his college education at Princeton University and where he grew up.

Carlson, who speaks with an English accent, previously claimed he grew up in Ramsgate, England, but admitted recently that he grew up in the United States.

The Daily confirmed that Carlson attended elementary school, middle schools and high schools throughout Minnesota, including Northfield High School, where a former classmate said Carlson did not have an accent. Also, the classmate did not have any knowledge of Carlson previously living in England.

In a Feb. 1 Daily article, Carlson said his English background would help him connect with the 2nd Ward’s immigrant population.

Carlson also provided the Daily with two fraudulent transcripts to Phillips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire and Princeton University. These schools, along with two other English schools he claimed to have attended, had no record of Carlson.

Carlson said he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia affective disorder, which impacts an individual’s ability to accurately judge reality. Although he said he did not know whether it has affected his perception, he admitted in a recent interview to making false claims in an attempt to hide a “messy past,” which Carlson said included two years in a mental institution.

“I spent six years being a gay nothing that people just made fun of, and then when I was discharged I found out that people would believe anything you told them,” he said. “And in an effort to substantiate who I am, to be something, I went too far.”

In a recent Daily interview, Carlson apologized for lying during his campaign.

“This campaign was never about me, it was really about the fact that I felt students were being neglected,” Carlson said. “I’m very sorry for not being honest.”

Carlson did participate in a Junior Statesman Summer School program in 2003 at Princeton University, Jeff Harris, executive director of the program, said. But the pressure of the program caused a mental breakdown, Carlson said.

Public records show that an attempt to commit Carlson to a mental institution was made just after his 18th birthday in December 2003, but was dismissed two months later.

Before the case was dismissed, a district court in Rice County, Minn., appointed Carlson a Guardian of the Person, which gives them the same rights and duties as a parent over a minor.

Carlson provided the Daily with court documents that state he was appointed a guardian because he was diagnosed with schizophrenic affective disorder and was unable to take care of himself.

A November 2005 letter from the South Central Human Relations Center, a mental health service provider in Owatonna, Minn., stated that Carlson had been under its care since February 2004, and recommended that his right to care for himself be restored.

Since that time, Carlson attended the DNC as an at-large delegate for Minnesota and has been taking classes at the University of Minnesota since spring 2007, according to Onestop Services.

Carlson said he lied about his past to Daily reporters because he was afraid people would not consider him a feasible candidate.

“The motivation behind my running is that I’m seeing a lot of injustices on campus, and it’s difficult to run a campaign when people don’t consider you viable,” he said. “In an attempt to make my campaign viable, I didn’t want to risk anything.”

Carlson said he is leaving the race because he was offered a job officiating tennis and will have to travel for the position.

Judy Grundstrom, a close friend of Carlson’s and managing principal at Inland Office for Tomorrow’s Architecture, where Carlson has worked, said she was unaware that Carlson did not grow up in England, nor that he had a history of mental illness.

“I’ve known Charles since April and I’ve always been aware that there is something going on with him and … he doesn’t have a lot of people in his life and that I should try and help him,” she said. “I do care about him.”

Carlson said he has already spoken with Ward 2 Councilman Cam Gordon about his concerns for the city and his plans to withdraw from the race.

Gordon said he preferred to not comment about Carlson’s withdrawal.

Other false claims

In a Sept. 2008 article titled, “Minnesota Represented at DNC by U student delegate,” Carlson stated that he officiated tennis at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. On Saturday Carlson admitted this claim is false.

Carlson also stated that he had a personal connection to Sen. Hillary Clinton that dated back to his childhood spent in England, where Clinton shared a crème brûlée torte with him. Carlson said this story is not true.

Carlson said he worked as a communications director on the Hillary Clinton campaign, but the Daily was not able to confirm this independently.

—Staff reporter Tiffany Smith contributed to this story."



Caucus Tomorrow!!!

Heyyy DFL members in Minneapolis..... Tomorrow is caucus night!

Time to nominate City officials.

The City of Minneapolis DFL caucuses are Tuesday, March 3 at 7:00 p.m.

Dear Neighbor,

The City of Minneapolis DFL will hold caucuses on Tuesday, March 3 at 7:00 p.m. to prepare for city elections. The business of these caucuses will be:

1. Elect delegates to ward conventions (to endorse City Council candidates)

2. Elect delegates to the Minneapolis city convention (to endorse Mayor, Park Board, and Board of Estimate and Taxation candidates)

3. Elect ward officers and committee members for ward conventions

There will be no straw polling or other voting at this year's caucus, so we have no reason to anticipate the long lines of 2008.

We hope to see you at caucuses! Although it feels like the 2008 election is not over yet (ahem, Senate race), we do have critical business at the city level.


want to see where to caucus? look, here

23.2.09

Bobby Jindal - CRCC puppet

Ok I know this really has northing to do with Minnesotan's and probably nothing to do with anyone that reads this blog.... but you know what.....I really don't like Bobby Jindal. He an ultra-partisan Republican. Listen to this interview. If there is ANYTHING that isn't a CRCC talking point on the stimulus, please tell me. This is so riduculous. The State that is still recovering from Katrina and 2 other huricanes in 2006 will be turning down stimulus money because the Governor is a "rising star" in the Repulican party.

Watch this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/29330857#29330857

19.2.09

Bachmann is misinformed or just lying thru her teeth

Michele Bachmann should be ashamed of herself. She spews all sorts of lies. This clip is another example of how Rep. Bachmann does care about the truth, only her partisan agenda.

here is the audio:
Some of the lies in this audio

ACORN
Bachmann: I mean, if you think, ACORN - this is a group that's under Federal indictment...

Baker: Unbelievable

Bachmann: ...for voter fraud. ACORN - they've received a total of $53 million in direct Federal Grants since 1994. Do you know how much they're getting under this (the stimulus) bill?

Baker: Like $4 billion, I've heard.

Bachmann: $5 Billion.

Baker? $5 billion?

Bachmann: For ACORN.


ACORN is not under investigation by the Justice Dept. Further, there is absolutely no money in the bill for ACORN


Jobs in Minnesota:

Bachmann claims that the stimulus drains jobs away from Republican districts and funnels them into Democratic Districts. But look

Minnesota 66,000

Congressional District 1 Minnesota 7,800
Congressional District 2 Minnesota 9,200
Congressional District 3 Minnesota 8,300
Congressional District 4 Minnesota 7,700
Congressional District 5 Minnesota 7,900
Congressional District 6 Minnesota 9,500
Congressional District 7 Minnesota 7,500
Congressional District 8 Minnesota 8,100

there ios more, can you spot them?

14.2.09

Republicans - Idealists or Obstructionists?


Sack


I see this as a perfect example. Republican are complaining about the stimulus as a giant pork package. Many including ll of the republican Minnesota delegation have complained that this will do nothing to help the economy and is just filled of pet projects. That being said, you don't hear anything from them about the projects this package that will be done in their districts. If there is such an idealistic opposition to the package, they should lobby MNDOT and othter state agencies to not spend money in their districts. If they really oppose this bill, then they should take stand. Instead, it looks like they will beb glad to welcome the money when it comes to benefit their constituents.


Furthermore, it seems that the stimulus will help the Minnesota Deficit. Pawlenty will be acceting money to help ofset the states budget troubles. Isn't that convenient.

13.2.09

MinnPost reports MN jobs in stimulus

If you have been reading my blog, you've noticed that my push on the stimulus is all about jobs, here and now. MinnPost has had excellent coverage on the stimulus and how it will affect Minnesota. Essentially, it comes down to Minnesota will be saving or creating a lot of good paying jobs. JOBS, JOBS, JOBS.... I can't emphasize how important a good paying job is to the economy. A good paying job essentially hold more economic weight. For example, a job at the Ford Ranger plant...a high skilled worker makes several retail or related jobs possible. Basically what it boils down to is if you save a well paid job, you save a lot more other jobs.





" To arrive at this number, some funding/tax cuts were reduced, others dropped.
One of the most talked about reductions was a cut of about $25 billion from a state fiscal stabilization fund. The fund had been $79 billion in the House and was lowered to $40 billion in the Senate. The compromise brought that amount back to $53.6 billion.n. ........

Negotiators also decided to cut back on spending that would have provided health insurance to the unemployed. The House version had provided a 65 percent subsidy for nine months. The Senate version reduced that to a 50 percent subsidy for 12 months. The compromise will include a 60 percent subsidy for nine months. The compromise also kept the elimination of the Medicaid option for unemployed individuals who are not eligible for COBRA, a provision that had been in the House version, but was cut out in the Senate........


Minnesota benefits

According to White House figures, here's what the compromise legislation provides Minnesota:

• 66,000 jobs created or saved over the next two years. (Under previous versions, this number was estimated at 70,000.) The jobs breakdown by Congressional is 7,100 in District 1, 8,400 in District 2, 7,600 in District 3, 7,000 in District 4, 7,200 in District 5, 8,700 in District 6, 6,800 in District 7 and 7,400 in District 8. (If you're a math person, these numbers do not equal 66,000… still.)

• A tax cut of up to $800 for 2,120,000 workers. (The cut had been $1,000 in previous legislation.)

• Makes 41,000 families eligible for a new American Opportunity Tax Credit. The credit is designed to make college affordable by creating a $2,500 partially refundable tax credit for four years of college.

• Offers an additional $100 per month in unemployment benefits to 331,000 workers in Minnesota who have lost their jobs in the recession and provides extended unemployment benefits to an additional 52,000 laid-off workers.

• Provides funding to modernize at least 91 schools in Minnesota."





Read full article here

11.2.09

Franken increases lead, barely

Franken picked up 24 votes today. The panel heard testimony from Franken supporters (61) and decided to grant some of them votes.

Read here

9.2.09

Coleman - absentee ballots are a long shot

Basically what it comes down to is that Coleman is looking to overturn the
slim lead by Franken by introducing ballots that come from skewed areas. He doesn't want to consider that there are ballots from Franken leading areas that were miscounted or wrongly rejected.


"If the 4,739 ballots Coleman wants the court to consider, 3,015 come from areas that voted for him over Franken in the Nov. 4 election. About a third of the ballots are from areas that gave Coleman more than 55 percent of their votes.

Carver County, which gave Coleman nearly 67 percent of the vote and a more lopsided victory than any other county, contributed 370 of those ballots.

Even in Hennepin County, whose already tabulated votes went nearly 60 percent to Franken, most of the absentee ballots Coleman wants reconsidered come from cities that voted for the Republican.

There are 1,385 Hennepin County ballots on Coleman's list. Just 38 percent of those, or 529 ballots, came from places that preferred Franken to Coleman. Democratic Minneapolis, the state's largest city, contributed 217 ballots to the list.

Most of the Hennepin County ballots on the list, 856 of them, come from Republican-leaning areas within the Democratic county. Plymouth, Maple Grove and Eden Prairie, all of which went for Coleman by greater than 55 percent among all counted ballots, contributed 335 ballots to Coleman's list." - Pioneer Press



I believe this is another clue that Franken will win this battle. Coleman's attempts at overturning the results are looking a bit desperate. His attempts also look more and more transparent. His motives are obvious and hopefully the judge panel sees through this attempt.

6.2.09

Obama Fires up Rhetoric

No more mister nice guy. Obama is now going to push this through Congress. This is a critical vote in the Senate that will probably go down today. If the vote doesn't pass, look for Obama to get even more fiery. This Stimulus is essential to the well being of our Nation and the State of Minnesota. it could provider as many as 91,000 jobs in Minnesota (more jobs than people live in Duluth) and up to a billion in infrastructure spending.
If you think that the stimulus is not a good idea just look at the numbers. Today the January jobs report came out. the numbers are now at 7.8% unemployment (not including under employment or people given up) and the lose of Jobs in January to 598,000 layoffs. That is nearly the size of 5th Congressional District (Mpls and 1st ring suburbs) or Nearly the size of the cities of Minneapolis and St Paul combined!!!!!



“I don’t care whether you’re driving a hybrid or an SUV,” he said. "If you’re headed for a cliff, you have to change direction. That’s what the American people called for in November, and that’s what we intend to deliver.” - Obama

2.2.09

18 Billion given for bonuses????

This is outrageous. LOOK I can't believe while I am drowning in debt with student loans, and can't get a car loan, these banks which have loaned nearly 350 billion at this point are now using it for bonuses for their star employees. Hey remember in the 4th quarter how our GDP shrank 4 percent, apparently Wall Street salaries are recession proof. This is just horrible PR for Wall Street and the Treasury Dept. Both need to get this straight quick before the outrage gets any louder!

A little instant analysis: Franken will probably win

A little excerpt on why I Think Franken will win the Election... although it will take a few more weeks (maybe 3?)

radiofiendmusic: 1st there is no precedent for overturning recounts
radiofiendmusic: 2nd the court said that Coleman would have to subpoena all of the 87 counties absentee ballots
radiofiendmusic: 3rd Coleman's arguments have been largely inconsistent through out the entire process

29.1.09

Rod's Out

another chapter in dirty politics is over. I can't wait until a new one begins!

20.1.09

New President...i'm stoked

obama Pictures, Images and Photos



I woke up hung over...but still managed to be in a great mood all day!!!!

Obama's speech was short and concise but very powerful. It might give you goosebumps.

12.1.09

On a side Note: Help?

I am looking to throw a pretty awesome party: Whats that mean? I need contacts for a warehouse party. Know artists or events companies wirth some sweet Warehouse space? hook me up

Totally Expected News: Franken Got the Boot

"Al Franken’s trial balloon argument that he should soon be seated in the Senate – at least on a provisional basis -- isn’t going very far.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) and Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, a Democrat, reiterated that no election certificate will be handed out until the post-recount legal activity is complete. Both issued separate statements to that effect this afternoon.

“Minnesota law is very clear on when a certificate of election can be issued. Neither the governor nor I may sign a certificate of election in the U.S. Senate race until all election contests have reached a final determination,” said Ritchie. “Even if the governor issues a certificate of election prior to the conclusion of the contest phase, I will not sign it.”

Added Pawlenty: “I have a duty to follow state law and our statutes are clear on this issue. I am prohibited from issuing a certificate of election until the election contest in the courts has been resolved.”" -Politico


My Analysis:
So its clear, because Coleman has contested the election and even with his political future at stake Minnesota will only have 1 Senator for several weeks or months. Minnesotans won't be happy with 99 Senators. When Roland Burris gets sworn in later this week, we will be the only State without full representation. Klobuchar is a good Senator to handle the extra services. I see very little chance of Coleman actually winning the seat, so I say bring it on! The fallout on his political future is almost certain. Hes hammering the nails in his own coffin. If the court challenge is what it takes for Coleman to go away, then sure I'll be patient.

6.1.09

Coleman to Contest Election

After listening to the coverage on MPR
I see that Coleman has decided to contest the election. Although this is completely in his right (up to 7 days after canvas board certification) this doesn't seem to be a very good political move. His chances of overturning the decisions in his favor are pretty small and even if he gets both decisions in his favor, he wold have a large deficit to over come. having votes be in his favor 2 to 1. There is not much room to gain those votes.
It will be very hard for him to win this election, and even harder for him to serve again without skepticism. It will be good to see what the lawsuit decisions to do the race, but frankly from what I have heard Minnesotans are sick of this race and want a quick conclusion to it. If Coleman decides to draw out the seating of Al Franken, it will most certainly be to the decrement of his political future.

News coference at 3 pm: I think that he might cocede

The prospects of Norm winning at this point are next to nothing. I think that there might be a chance he concedes setting up a political future. If he fights this out and still ends up the loser it might shoot down his political future. If he somehow fights and pulls an upset, his new term would be clouded in controversy. So if Norm wants to be a candidate again (ex. Gov 2010), hi best chances of a future are if he concedes today.




Also I stole this piece from the Power Liberal, I thought it was very relevant.

5.1.09

Coleman Locked Out of his Office

"About 20 Coleman staffers had showed up for work at the senator's Washington office today, but they were ordered to close the office around midday by Howard Gantman, staff director for the Senate Rules and Administration committee.

Gantman said that Coleman's staff could NOT carry on Senate business. The senator's term had officially expired on Saturday.

But the senator released a statement indicating that the seemingly clear order might be subject to debate:

"Without question, this is a unique situation in the history of the Senate and specifics are still to be determined as to the future of the Senate office,'' Coleman said in the statement." MinnPost

Coleman has official been locked out of his office because of the Senate Rules. That's satisfying. I hope you all can enjoy this as much as me.

Franken Wins according to Canvas Board and SoS...But more to follow

"Al Franken was declared the winner over Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.) in the Minnesota Senate race, but the Coleman campaign has announced it will be contesting the results in a post-election challenge." says Politico.


My analysis:
-Basically here is how it rolls out. Franken is 225 votes ahead after the recount. That is nearly a 1000 vote swing from election night projections. The recount looks to be transparent conducted by non-partisan county election officials a TRI-partisan canvas board that included 2 Republicans (appointed by Pawlenty) and 2 Independents and only 1 Democrat (SoS Mark Ritchie). There doesn't seem to be a lot of avenues for Coleman to sue. There is a current suit by the Coleman campaign over a contested 654 votes, which neither county auditors, the canvas board or the Franken campaign. In the MN Supreme Court decision earlier, it stated that all concerned parties must agree. The lack of a real decision by the court probably suggests that the suit won't get any real post-election differing results.

Even hypothetically, if Coleman gets the 654 votes included in the recount, and even further sues for the 133 votes that he claims were double counted, the problem is he would still have to net at least 225 votes. If both decisions are in his favor that only leaves 787 votes. Many didn't believe Franken would be up by such a large margin, but he is. This is statistically very difficult. Coleman would have to get 65% of the votes. That is very very dificult.
Chances are he wont get those decisions, and even if he does he would hve to get a very large margin of them. So at this point it looks like Franken is an almost certain winner.

Time to start cheering.

I Got a job - although its unpaid

Keith Ellison's Minneapolis Office offered me a job as an intern. I plan on taking it and learn more from the inside. I am totally excited. Keith is one of my heroes and I hop I can learn a lot from this job

Hiatus

I have been on hiatus.... Sorry....really, it would be nice to get some feedback on how you all would like to see my blog transformed...

The MORE feedback I get the better the blog gets